DORA Reporting in Italy: Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS Guide
Italy DORA supervision across Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS: scope by entity type, INFOSTAT reporting, ICT incident evidence and 2026 evidence checklist.
CyAdviso Insights
Field notes from running DORA programmes at EU-licensed institutions. No fluff. 35 posts.
Start here
Topic clusters
Italy DORA supervision across Banca d'Italia, CONSOB and IVASS: scope by entity type, INFOSTAT reporting, ICT incident evidence and 2026 evidence checklist.
Anonymised DORA case study for an EU-licensed EMI: gap analysis, ICT risk framework, incident workflow, supplier evidence and board-ready remediation plan.
France DORA supervision is split between ACPR and AMF. Scope by entity type, ICT incident reporting channels, Register of Information and evidence checklist.
DORA TLPT guide for 2026: who is in scope, how Article 26 works, what evidence to keep and how EU-licensed financial entities should prepare without overclaim.
Practical 2026 guide to DORA Articles 11 and 12 BCDR: ICT continuity policy, backup, restoration, RTO and RPO, testing, suppliers and supervisory evidence.
DORA vs MiCA for EU fintechs and CASPs in 2026: scope, authorisation, ICT risk, incident reporting, TLPT and operational resilience obligations explained today.
DORA incident reporting in 2026: 4h after classification, 24h detection ceiling, 72h intermediate report, 1-month final report and a full evidence workflow.
BaFin — Germany's DORA competent authority for credit institutions, payment firms, EMIs, investment firms, insurers and CASPs: scope, ICT reporting, evidence.
Netherlands DORA supervision splits between De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) and the Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM): scope, ICT reporting and evidence.
Practical 2026 DORA compliance guide for European fintech SMBs: scope, evidence, incidents, ICT third-party risk, board oversight and remediation roadmap step.
CSSF — Luxembourg's DORA competent authority for banks, investment firms, payment firms / EMIs, fund managers and CASPs: scope, ICT reporting and evidence pack.
Central Bank of Ireland — DORA competent authority for credit institutions, EMIs, PIs, investment firms, insurers and CASPs: scope, ICT reporting and evidence.
DORA vs PSD2/PSD3 for EU payment institutions and EMIs in 2026: operational resilience, payment security, incident reporting, SCA, fraud and third-party ICT.
MFSA — Malta's DORA competent authority for credit institutions, EMIs, PIs, investment firms, insurers and CASPs: scope, ICT reporting and evidence pack today.
Cyprus splits DORA supervision between Central Bank of Cyprus, CySEC and the Superintendent of Insurance: scope by entity type, ICT reporting and evidence pack.
Finantsinspektsioon as the DORA competent authority in Estonia: scope, ICT incident reporting framing, Register of Information and a 2026 evidence checklist.
Finanstilsynet — Denmark's DORA competent authority for banks, payment firms, investment firms and insurers: scope, ICT incident reporting and evidence today.
Finansinspektionen — Sweden's DORA competent authority for credit institutions, payment firms, investment firms and CASPs: scope, ICT reporting and evidence.
Latvijas Banka as the consolidated DORA competent authority for Latvia: scope, ICT incident framing, Register of Information and 2026 evidence checklist today.
DORA board responsibilities for 2026: management-body duties, ICT risk oversight, approvals, reporting cadence and a supervisory-ready evidence checklist today.
Lietuvos bankas as the DORA competent authority for fintechs in Lithuania: who is in scope, ICT incident reporting framing, evidence checklist and 2026 sources.
DORA vs NIS2 in 2026: scope, lex specialis, incident reporting, ICT risk, third-party oversight and what EU-licensed financial entities should document today.
DORA proportionality principle in 2026: how smaller EU financial entities scale ICT risk, testing, third-party controls and produce supervisory-ready evidence.
DORA vs PCI DSS 4.0.1 for EU fintechs in 2026: scope, enforcement, incident reporting, cardholder data, ICT risk and a build-once evidence approach in 2026.
Seven practical DORA compliance mistakes that still create supervisory risk in 2026: weak ownership, stale evidence, incident gaps and third-party blind spots.
Cyber Resilience Act vs DORA in 2026: how product cybersecurity, financial operational resilience, vulnerability reporting and ICT vendor duties fit together.
Practical 2026 guide to DORA requirements: ICT risk, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party risk, Register of Information and board-ready evidence.
DORA Register of Information guide for 2026: required data fields, ICT third-party mapping, critical functions, validation controls and submission readiness.
DORA compliance checklist for 2026: scope, ICT risk framework, incident reporting, resilience testing, third-party risk, evidence and governance management.
DORA ICT risk register template for 2026: required fields, risk scoring, control mapping, ownership, third-party dependencies and board-ready audit evidence.
What a virtual CISO delivers in 2026 for EU fintechs and SaaS scaleups: governance, ICT risk, incident readiness, supplier oversight and board evidence today.
vCISO pricing in 2026 for EU fintechs and SaaS scaleups: retainers, 90-day programmes, scope drivers, proposal comparison and budget-friendly guardrails today.
Hiring a virtual CISO in 2026: how EU-licensed fintechs define scope, compare providers, avoid weak retainers and structure a 90-day evidence-driven roadmap.
Everything an EU fintech leader should know about a virtual CISO in 2026: scope, evidence, DORA, board reporting, incident readiness and buying criteria today.
How EBA/GL/2019/04 fits with DORA in 2026: narrowed scope, audit use, ICT risk evidence, governance, outsourcing and payment-services security obligations.